The Website Redesign Process: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide for 2026

Most website redesigns do not fail because the design was ugly. They fail because nobody defined what the site was supposed to do before the first pixel was pushed, and because the project quietly ballooned from a six-week refresh into a nine-month slog that cost three times the original quote. A disciplined website redesign process is the single biggest predictor of whether your new site ships on time, converts better than the old one, and does not need another rebuild in eighteen months. This guide walks you through every step we use when we scope, design, and ship sites for clients, along with the numbers, checkpoints, and mistakes that separate a redesign that pays for itself from one that becomes a sunk cost.

TL;DR

• Process beats talent: A structured website redesign process, with defined phases, sign-off gates, and measurable goals, is worth more than a talented designer working without a brief. Teams that follow a documented process ship 30 to 40 percent faster and hit their conversion targets far more often.
• Content and strategy come before design: The most expensive redesign mistakes happen when you jump to visuals before you have locked your goals, content, and functional specification. Front-loading strategy typically cuts rework by 50 percent or more.
• Measure or it did not happen: A redesign without a 30/60/90 day measurement plan is a vanity project. Baseline your current conversion rate, bounce rate, and load time before you touch anything, then hold the new site accountable to those numbers.

Step 1: Audit Your Current Website and Define the Real Problem

Before you talk about color palettes or navigation menus, you need to know what is actually broken. A redesign is a business decision disguised as a design project, and the single most common reason redesigns disappoint is that they solve a problem nobody bothered to define.

At Presta, we’ve seen founders show up asking for “a modern look” when their real issue was a checkout flow that leaked 60 percent of qualified traffic before payment. A fresh coat of paint would not have moved a single dollar. The audit is where you separate the symptom from the disease.

What should a website redesign audit actually measure?

A useful audit is quantitative first, aesthetic second. Pull the hard numbers before you form any opinions. You want a baseline you can hold the new site accountable to, because “it feels better” is not a KPI.

Here is the audit inventory we run for clients:

Audit area	What to capture	Why it matters
Traffic and sources	Sessions, top channels, organic vs paid split	Tells you which pages carry the load
Conversion	Macro and micro conversion rates by page	Reveals where money leaks
Behavior	Bounce rate, scroll depth, exit pages	Shows friction and dead ends
Performance	Core Web Vitals, load time, mobile scores	A 1 second delay can cut conversions 7 percent
Content	Page count, thin pages, top-ranking URLs	Protects your existing SEO equity
Technical	Broken links, redirect chains, crawl errors	Prevents traffic loss at migration

How do you turn an audit into a problem statement?

Once you have the data, write one sentence that names the problem in business terms. Not “the site looks dated,” but “the site converts mobile visitors at 0.8 percent versus a 2.1 percent industry benchmark, costing roughly $14,000 per month in lost revenue.” That sentence becomes the north star for every decision that follows.

This is the same principle behind one of the sharpest projects our team has shipped. When we built the platform for Mala Farma, an AgTech client helping small Serbian farmers stay both profitable and legal, the problem was not “the information is ugly.” The problem was that farmers were forced to read through an enormous, intimidating body of legal documentation to figure out which rules applied to them. We defined the real problem first: this was a navigation and decision problem, not a content problem. That definition changed everything about the solution, which we will return to later in this guide.

Pro Tip: Run your audit against three named competitors, not just your own history. Improving 20 percent over your old self means nothing if a competitor is converting at twice your rate. Benchmarking externally reframes “good enough” into “competitive.”

Checkpoint: You have a one-sentence, number-backed problem statement and a baseline snapshot of your current conversion rate, bounce rate, and load time saved somewhere you can reference throughout the project.

• Baseline metrics: Export traffic, conversion, and performance numbers before any changes.
• Problem statement: Write the core problem in one measurable business sentence.
• Content inventory: List every URL, flagging top performers to protect and thin pages to cut.
• Competitor benchmark: Capture conversion and UX gaps against three real competitors.
• SEO equity map: Note which pages currently rank so you do not destroy them.

Step 2: Set Goals, Scope, and Success Metrics

A redesign with no defined finish line is a redesign that never finishes. This step converts your problem statement into concrete, measurable goals and a scope that everyone signs off on in writing.

We treat scope as a contract, not a suggestion. When we scope this for clients, the difference between a project that lands on budget and one that overruns by 40 percent is almost always whether the scope was locked before design started or negotiated continuously afterward.

What makes a good redesign goal?

Vague goals produce vague sites. “Improve the brand” is not a goal. “Increase demo-request conversion rate from 1.2 percent to 2.5 percent within 90 days of launch” is a goal, because it is specific, measurable, and time-bound. Tie every goal to a number you captured in Step 1.

Use this framework we call the OUTCOME goal test. Every redesign goal should pass all five checks:

1. Owned: A single person is accountable for the number.
2. Baselined: You know the current value today.
3. Time-bound: There is a deadline, usually 30, 60, or 90 days post-launch.
4. Revenue-linked: You can trace it to money or a clear proxy.
5. Realistic: The target is ambitious but grounded in your audit and benchmarks.

How do you scope without underestimating?

Scope creep is the tax you pay for being vague early. The antidote is a written scope document that names every page template, integration, and content type in the build, plus an explicit list of what is out of scope for this phase.

Scope element	Small business site	Growth-stage SaaS	Ecommerce replatform
Page templates	5 to 10	12 to 25	20 to 40+
Typical timeline	4 to 7 weeks	8 to 14 weeks	12 to 20 weeks
Budget range	$6k to $18k	$25k to $70k	$60k to $200k+
Key risk	Underinvesting in content	Feature bloat	Data migration and SEO loss

Our detailed breakdown of the 9 phases of a website redesign process that actually ship in 2026 goes deeper on how to sequence these phases so scope stays contained.

Checkpoint: You have 3 to 5 written goals that all pass the OUTCOME test, plus a signed scope document listing every template and integration, and an explicit out-of-scope list.

• Goal count: Lock 3 to 5 measurable goals, not a wish list of 15.
• Written scope: Document every page template and integration in one file.
• Out-of-scope list: Name what you are deliberately not building this phase.
• Success metrics: Assign a target number and owner to each goal.
• Sign-off gate: Get written approval before any design begins.

Step 3: Lock Your Content Strategy and Functional Specification

Here is the truth most agencies will not tell you: content is the hardest, slowest, most underestimated part of any redesign, and it should come before design, not after. Designing beautiful templates around content that does not exist yet is how projects stall for months while everyone waits on copy.

Our Startup Studio team frequently builds the content architecture and functional specification before a single design mockup, and it is not a coincidence that those projects ship 30 to 50 percent faster than ones where content is treated as an afterthought.

Why does content come before design?

Because content determines structure. You cannot design a page template until you know what it needs to hold. When content follows design, you get the “lorem ipsum trap”: gorgeous layouts that break the moment real, variable-length copy pours in, forcing expensive redesign rounds.

Map your content first using our approach to website content planning. Decide what each page must accomplish, what proof it needs, and what action it should drive, then design a template that serves that job.

What is a functional specification and why do you need one?

A functional specification is the blueprint that describes exactly what the site must do: every form, every filter, every integration, every conditional behavior. It is the document that prevents the “I thought it would also do X” conversation three days before launch.

This is where the Mala Farma project is instructive. We did not just write content; we designed a decision tree. Instead of forcing farmers to read an enormous legal database, we reduced the entire navigation problem to four questions: activity, type of meat, origin of the meat, and yearly quantity. Each question offered only two or three answers. Four clicks took a farmer from the landing page to exactly the legal documents and regulations that applied to them, and we paired it with a full brand identity and a set of custom illustrations and icons.

That is the core of our approach: reduce a database navigation problem to a decision tree by identifying the small number of variables that actually determine the outcome, then asking only those. Define the problem, collect information, brainstorm and analyse, develop solutions, present for feedback, improve. None of that could have been designed as a visual exercise first. It had to be specified as a functional problem, then dressed in design.

Our full write-up on building a functional specification for a new website covers how we structure these documents so nothing gets lost between strategy and build.

Pro Tip: Write your call-to-action copy before you write anything else on the page, then work backward. If you know the exact action you want, every headline, subhead, and proof point becomes a supporting argument for that one click. This single habit has lifted landing-page conversion by double digits on multiple projects.

Checkpoint: You have final content for at least your top 10 pages by traffic or importance, and a functional specification signed off that lists every interactive feature and integration.

• Content-first order: Finalize copy and structure before touching design.
• Page jobs defined: Every page has one primary action it must drive.
• Functional spec: Document every form, filter, and integration in writing.
• Decision-tree thinking: Reduce complex navigation to the fewest variables that matter.
• Proof mapped: Assign testimonials, data, and trust signals to specific pages.

Step 4: Design the Experience Around Conversion, Not Decoration

Now, and only now, does visual design begin. By this point you know the problem, the goals, the content, and the functionality. Design becomes a matter of making that clarity beautiful and usable, not inventing it from scratch.

The best website redesign process treats design as the last 20 percent of thinking, not the first 80 percent of the budget.

How should design decisions be made?

Every design decision should trace back to a goal from Step 2. A hero section is not there to look impressive; it is there to communicate value and drive the primary action within five seconds. When we review designs internally, we ask one question of every element: what is this doing for the user’s decision, and does it move them toward the goal? If the answer is “it looks nice,” it is decoration, and decoration that does not serve a purpose is friction.

Our team documents the design phase of a new website so clients can see how visual choices tie back to strategy rather than taste. Design in this framework is accountable, not subjective.

What is the difference between a mockup and a prototype?

A mockup shows what the site looks like. A prototype shows how it behaves. For anything with real interaction, forms, filters, multi-step flows, you want a clickable prototype before development, because catching a broken flow in a prototype costs an hour, while catching it in code costs a day.

Design artifact	What it proves	Effort	When to use
Wireframe	Structure and hierarchy	Low	Every project, early
Static mockup	Visual direction and brand	Medium	Marketing pages
Clickable prototype	Flow and interaction logic	Medium to high	Forms, funnels, apps
Design system	Consistency at scale	High	Sites with 15+ templates

Checkpoint: You have approved designs for every unique template, and a clickable prototype for any page involving a multi-step interaction, with every design element traceable to a stated goal.

• Goal-traceable design: Every element serves a defined user decision.
• Mobile-first: Design the smallest screen first, then scale up.
• Prototype the flows: Test interactions before writing code.
• Design system: Build reusable components, not one-off pages.
• Accessibility baseline: Meet contrast and keyboard-navigation standards from the start.

Accelerate Your Redesign With Presta’s Startup Studio

If you have read this far, you already understand that a website redesign process is less about design flair and more about disciplined execution across strategy, content, functionality, and measurement. That is exactly the work our Startup Studio does every week, turning vague “we need a new site” ambitions into shipped products that hit their conversion targets. We have compressed timelines by 30 to 50 percent for clients precisely because we do not skip the front-loaded strategy work that saves months of rework later. If you want a partner who treats your redesign as a business outcome rather than a decoration exercise, talk to Presta’s Startup Studio about your redesign and let us scope it properly from the first conversation.

Step 5: Build, Migrate, and Protect Your SEO

Development is where the plan meets reality. If Steps 1 through 4 were done well, this step is largely mechanical. If they were rushed, this is where the project starts bleeding time and budget.

Our documentation on starting development on a new website walks through how we sequence the build so QA is continuous rather than crammed into the final week.

How do you migrate without losing search rankings?

This is the step that keeps founders awake, and rightly so. We have seen poorly executed migrations wipe out 40 to 60 percent of organic traffic overnight because nobody mapped the old URLs to the new ones. Search equity is an asset you spent years building; treat migration like moving a vault, not clearing out a garage.

The non-negotiable SEO migration checklist:

1. Map every old URL to its new destination with 301 redirects.
2. Preserve or improve title tags and meta descriptions on your top pages.
3. Keep your highest-ranking content live, do not “clean it up” into oblivion.
4. Submit a fresh XML sitemap and monitor Search Console daily post-launch.
5. Check for redirect chains and loops before going live.
6. Retain structured data and schema on key pages.

What should never launch without QA?

Nothing. But specifically, test every form submission end to end, every payment or lead-capture integration, and the site on real mobile devices, not just a resized browser window. A form that silently fails to send is worse than no form at all, because you lose leads without ever knowing.

Checkpoint: Every URL redirects correctly, every form and integration has been tested with a real submission, and the site passes Core Web Vitals on mobile before launch.

• Redirect map: 301 every old URL to a relevant new one.
• SEO preservation: Keep top-ranking pages and their metadata intact.
• End-to-end QA: Submit every form and complete every transaction as a real user.
• Mobile testing: Verify on actual devices, not just emulators.
• Launch monitoring: Watch Search Console and analytics daily for two weeks.

Step 6: Launch, Measure, and Iterate

Launch day is a milestone, not a finish line. The redesign is not successful because it went live; it is successful when it beats the baseline numbers you captured in Step 1. This is where discipline separates operators from dabblers.

What KPIs prove a redesign worked?

You measure against the exact metrics you baselined. If your problem statement said mobile converts at 0.8 percent, then day one of the new site, you start watching that number climb toward your target. Track progress transparently; our approach to progress tracking through a website project keeps everyone honest about whether the redesign is delivering.

Here is the 30/60/90 day measurement plan we hold every redesign to:

Timeframe	What to measure	Expected signal
30 days	Load time, bounce rate, crawl health, no ranking drops	Technical parity or better; traffic stable
60 days	Conversion rate, engagement, form completions	Early conversion lift of 10 to 25 percent
90 days	Revenue, qualified leads, organic recovery and growth	Goals from Step 2 hit or clearly trending toward target

If organic traffic dips in the first 30 days, do not panic; a small temporary dip during reindexing is normal. If it has not recovered by day 60, that is a signal something in the migration went wrong and needs immediate investigation.

Pro Tip: Set up a single dashboard that shows your redesign goals side by side with their baselines and live numbers. When the whole team can see the scoreboard, arguments about whether the redesign “worked” evaporate into data. We build this dashboard before launch, not after, so day one already has a scoreboard.

Checkpoint: Your live analytics dashboard shows current numbers against baselines and targets, and you have a written iteration plan for whatever the 30-day data reveals.

• Baseline comparison: Track live numbers against your Step 1 snapshot.
• 30/60/90 cadence: Review against the measurement plan at each milestone.
• Ranking watch: Confirm organic recovery within 60 days.
• Iteration backlog: Log data-driven improvements, not opinion-driven ones.
• Scoreboard visibility: Give the whole team access to the live dashboard.

Step 7: Optimize With Data, Not Opinions

A redesign is a hypothesis, and launch is when you start testing it. The teams that get the most out of their new site treat the first 90 days as the beginning of an optimization loop, not the end of a project. This is the compounding phase where small, tested changes add up to meaningful revenue.

What should you optimize first?

Optimize the pages that carry the most traffic and the most money, in that order. A 10 percent conversion improvement on your highest-traffic landing page is worth more than perfecting a page five people visit a month. Prioritize ruthlessly by impact.

We use a simple prioritization framework we call the LIFT list, ranking every optimization idea by four factors:

1. Leverage: How many users does this touch?
2. Impact: How much could it move the key metric?
3. Friction: How hard is it to test?
4. Trust: How confident are we it will help, based on data?

Ideas that score high on leverage and impact but low on friction go first. This is how you avoid spending three weeks perfecting a button color while a broken mobile menu leaks conversions.

How often should you test changes?

Run one meaningful test at a time on any given page so you can attribute the result cleanly. On a site with real traffic, aim for a testing cadence of one to two experiments per month per priority page, and let each run long enough to reach statistical confidence, typically two to four weeks depending on traffic volume.

Checkpoint: You have a prioritized optimization backlog ranked by the LIFT list, and at least one live experiment running on your highest-value page.

• Impact-first: Optimize high-traffic, high-revenue pages before anything else.
• LIFT ranking: Score every idea by leverage, impact, friction, and trust.
• One variable: Test single changes so results are attributable.
• Statistical patience: Let tests run to confidence before calling a winner.
• Compounding loop: Feed winners back into the design system for reuse.

Common Mistakes in the Website Redesign Process

Even experienced teams repeat the same handful of errors. Here are the three that cost the most, and exactly how to avoid them.

Mistake: Starting with design before content and strategy are locked. Why It Happens: Design is the fun, visible part, and stakeholders get excited by mockups long before the boring strategy work is done. Fix: Refuse to open a design tool until your content and functional specification are signed off, which typically cuts total rework by half.

Mistake: Redesigning without baselining current performance. Why It Happens: Teams are eager to move forward and assume the old site is so bad that anything new must be better. Fix: Export your conversion, bounce, and load-time numbers before you change a thing, so you can prove whether the new site actually won.

Mistake: Treating SEO migration as an afterthought on launch day. Why It Happens: URL mapping and redirects are invisible, tedious work that gets deprioritized under launch pressure. Fix: Build your 301 redirect map during development, not after launch, and monitor Search Console daily for two weeks post-launch.

• Strategy gate: Do not design until content and specs are approved.
• Baseline first: Capture current metrics before any change.
• Redirect discipline: Map every URL before launch, never after.
• QA everything: Test every form and transaction as a real user.
• Measure honestly: Hold the new site to the old site’s numbers.

Advanced Tips for a Redesign That Keeps Paying Off

Once you have shipped a redesign that beats its baseline, the difference between a good site and a great one comes down to a few advanced habits that compound over time.

Build a living design system, not a static site. If every future page pulls from a shared component library, you cut the cost of your next set of landing pages by 40 to 60 percent and keep the brand consistent without policing every edit. Our reflection on the journey of building a new website shows how a systematized approach pays dividends long after launch.

Design for AI search, not just Google’s blue links. The way people find information is shifting toward AI-generated answers, which means clear, well-structured content with strong headings, direct answers to real questions, and clean schema markup increasingly determines whether your pages get cited. Structure your content so a machine can extract a clean answer, and you future-proof your visibility.

Know whether you are even the right kind of client for a full redesign. Not every business needs a heavy custom build; some need a sharp presentational site done well. Understanding what makes an ideal client for a presentational website can save you from over-engineering a solution to a problem you do not have.

Treat the redesign as a roadmap, not a one-time event. The strongest sites we work on follow a website redesign roadmap that plans the next two or three quarters of improvements from day one, so momentum never stalls after launch.

• Design system: Systematize components to cut future build costs.
• AI-ready content: Structure pages so machines can extract clean answers.
• Right-fit scoping: Match the build type to the actual business need.
• Ongoing roadmap: Plan improvements for quarters ahead, not just launch.
• Reusable wins: Feed every tested improvement back into the system.

If you are just getting started with a redesign, prioritize the audit and problem statement above everything else, because every downstream decision inherits the quality of that first sentence, and skipping it is the single most expensive shortcut in this entire process. If instead you are auditing a site that already exists, start by baselining your current conversion and performance numbers and mapping your top-ranking URLs, so that when you do change things, you can prove whether the change helped or hurt rather than guessing.

Next Steps:

• Baseline audit: Export your current conversion, bounce, and load-time metrics today.
• Problem statement: Write your redesign problem in one measurable business sentence.
• Scope conversation: Lock 3 to 5 goals and a written scope before any design begins.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the website redesign process?

The website redesign process is the structured sequence of phases a team follows to rebuild a website in a way that improves business outcomes rather than just appearance. At its core it moves through auditing the current site, defining goals and scope, locking content and functional specifications, designing the experience, building and migrating, launching with measurement, and then optimizing based on data.

The reason we emphasize “process” rather than “project” is that a process implies repeatable discipline and defined gates between phases. A redesign done as an ad-hoc project tends to skip the unglamorous but critical steps like baselining metrics and mapping redirects, which is exactly where most redesigns quietly fail.

Done well, the process is front-loaded with strategy and content work, which feels slower at the start but ends up shipping the finished site 30 to 50 percent faster because there is far less rework once design and development begin.

How long does the website redesign process take?

For a straightforward presentational or small business site, the website redesign process typically takes 4 to 7 weeks from kickoff to launch. A growth-stage SaaS or content-heavy site usually runs 8 to 14 weeks, and a full ecommerce replatform with data migration can take 12 to 20 weeks or more.

The single biggest variable in timeline is not design or development speed; it is content readiness. Projects stall for weeks or months when copy, imagery, and product data are not finalized before design begins. Teams that treat content as the first deliverable rather than the last consistently hit the shorter end of these ranges.

The second biggest variable is decision-making speed on the client side. Every review round where sign-off drags on for a week adds directly to the timeline. When we scope this for clients, we build defined sign-off windows into the schedule precisely to keep the project from drifting.

What are the steps in a website redesign?

The steps in a website redesign, in the order we run them, are: audit the current site and define the real problem, set goals and scope with measurable success metrics, lock content strategy and the functional specification, design the experience around conversion, build and migrate while protecting SEO, launch and measure against your baselines, and then optimize continuously with data.

The order matters enormously. The most common and expensive mistake is inverting it, starting with design because it is the visible, exciting part, then trying to retrofit strategy and content into layouts that were never built to hold them.

Each step also has a checkpoint, a concrete way to confirm it worked before moving on. If you cannot pass a checkpoint, do not advance; every phase inherits the quality of the one before it.

Should I redesign my whole site or just parts of it?

It depends entirely on what your audit reveals. If your data shows the problem is concentrated, say a single high-traffic landing page converting poorly or a broken checkout flow, a targeted rebuild of those elements may deliver 80 percent of the value at 20 percent of the cost of a full redesign.

A full redesign makes sense when the problems are systemic: outdated technology that cannot support new features, a brand that no longer represents the business, structural information architecture problems, or an SEO foundation that needs rebuilding. In those cases, patching individual pages just delays the inevitable and often costs more in the long run.

The honest answer is that many businesses jump to a full redesign when a focused optimization sprint would have served them better. Baseline your numbers, define the problem precisely, and let the scope follow the evidence rather than the excitement.

How do I keep my SEO rankings during a redesign?

Protecting SEO during a redesign comes down to disciplined URL and content management. Map every existing URL to its new destination with a 301 redirect, preserve the title tags and metadata on your top-ranking pages, and keep your highest-performing content live rather than “cleaning it up” out of existence.

Before launch, eliminate redirect chains and loops, retain your structured data, and prepare a fresh XML sitemap. After launch, monitor Search Console daily for the first two weeks, because that is when reindexing happens and when any migration errors will show up as ranking or crawl issues.

A small, temporary traffic dip during the first 30 days is normal as search engines re-crawl the new structure. If traffic has not recovered by day 60, that is a red flag that something in the migration needs urgent investigation, most often a redirect that was missed or a page that was unintentionally deindexed.

When does it make sense to bring in Presta’s Startup Studio for a redesign?

Candidly, not every redesign needs an agency. If you have a simple presentational site, in-house design capability, and the discipline to run the process yourself, you can absolutely do this without outside help, and you should not pay for expertise you do not need.

The threshold where it becomes worth bringing in a partner is usually one of three situations. First, when the redesign involves real functional complexity, custom logic, integrations, multi-step flows, or data migration, where a mistake is expensive and hard to reverse. Second, when speed matters and you cannot afford the 30 to 50 percent slower timeline that comes from a team learning the process while doing it. Third, when the redesign is tied directly to revenue or fundraising milestones, and the cost of getting it wrong dwarfs the cost of doing it right.

That is precisely the kind of work our Startup Studio takes on. The Mala Farma project we described earlier is a good example: reducing an enormous legal database to a four-click decision tree required defining the problem correctly, then building custom functionality and brand around it. That is not a template-swap job. If your redesign has that kind of complexity or stakes, reaching out to Presta to scope it properly is usually cheaper than discovering the gaps yourself mid-build.

What is the biggest mistake teams make in a website redesign?

The single biggest mistake is starting design before strategy and content are locked. It happens because design is visible and satisfying while strategy work feels like an unglamorous delay, so stakeholders push to see mockups early.

The consequence is expensive rework. Layouts designed around placeholder content break when real copy arrives, functional requirements surface after templates are already built, and the project balloons in both cost and timeline. Front-loading the strategy and content work typically cuts total rework in half.

The fix is a simple rule with real teeth: no design tool opens until the content and functional specification are signed off. It feels slow for the first two weeks and pays that time back several times over across the rest of the project.

How much should a website redesign cost?

Costs vary widely by complexity. A small business or presentational redesign typically runs $6,000 to $18,000, a growth-stage SaaS site $25,000 to $70,000, and a full ecommerce replatform $60,000 to $200,000 or more, depending on integrations and data migration needs.

The more useful way to think about cost is against the value of the problem you defined in your audit. If your site is leaking $14,000 a month in lost conversions, a $40,000 redesign that fixes it pays for itself in under three months. Cost only looks high when you have not quantified what the current site is costing you.

Be wary of quotes that come in dramatically low, because they almost always exclude the strategy, content, and QA work that determine whether the redesign actually succeeds. The cheapest redesign is the one you only have to do once.

Sources

• Journey Of A New Website
• Journey Of A New Website Progress Tracking
• Journey Of A New Website Design
• Journey Of A New Website Content
• Journey Of A New Website Functional Specification
• Journey Of A New Website Starting Development
• Website Redesign Roadmap
• 9 Phases Of A Website Redesign Process That Actually Ship In 2026
• What Makes You An Ideal Client For A Presentational Website
• Hire Presta’s Startup Studio to Launch and Scale
• Contact Presta